INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
Image copyrightAFPImage caption
No reports about the video were made to Facebook while it was being broadcast
Facebook has shared more details of the efforts it made to remove videos of the Christchurch attacks.Fifty people died and dozens more
were injured by the twin shootings at two mosques on 15 March.No reports about the graphic content in the live stream were made until 12
minutes after it ended, said Facebook.The information comes as ISPs in Australia and New Zealand reveal they have blocked dozens of sites
that shared videos of the attacks.New Zealand's Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has condemned the shootings as a "terrorist attack".Detect and
deleteGuy Rosen, vice-president of integrity at Facebook, said in a blog that when users reported the video, they did not use terms or tags
that would have prompted the social network to review it more quickly."The video was reported for reasons other than suicide and as such it
was handled according to different procedures," wrote Mr Rosen.The incident led Facebook to re-examine its reporting system, so that it can
react more quickly to live videos showing disturbing or graphic content.It said it was also reviewing the way it shared information to make
it easier for other organisations and sites to spot copies
Facebook said the automatic systems it uses to spot propaganda or terrorist output were caught out in two ways with the Christchurch
videos.First, it said, a "core community of bad actors" worked together to continually reupload edited copies of the video that were altered
to defeat the detection systemsSecond, the way people shared the video, sometimes by recording clips shown on TV, made it harder to spot
copiesIn total, 800 different variants of the video were found and blocked on Facebook
Active measuresISPs in the region have also stepped up efforts to stop the video circulating by blocking sites that were actively sharing it
The sites blocked included 4chan and 8chan as well as LiveLeak and Voat.The decision to block access was made independently by ISPs in the
wake of the deadly attacks."This was an extreme case which we think requires an extraordinary response," Vodafone Australia said in a
statement to news organisations.Australian ISP Telstra said although the decision to block access may "inconvenience" some people it felt
the decision was "the right thing to do".Some of the Australian blocks were short-lived with access restored only hours after the sites were
Australians were allowed to view the sites again once they removed copies of the Christchurch video
Larger sites such as Facebook and Twitter were not blocked because of the "active steps" they took to remove material.
