INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
Desmond James' lawyer said his client's penis did not match the description the accused provided.
A Connecticut man accused of rape was acquitted this week after employing an unusual
defense tactic: dropping his pants in court and showing his penis to the jury.Defense attorney Todd Bussert said it was "the only real,
viable option" in a case where a woman claimed she was raped in 2012 by a person she described as a black man whose penis was lighter than
the rest of his body. In 2014, the woman identified her rapist as Desmond James after seeing his picture in a news report
There was one major issue, according to Bussert: His client's penis did not match the description the accuser provided.During the trial,
which started Monday in New Haven, Bussert said the defense had planned to use several photographs they had taken of James's private parts
to prove he wasn't the suspect in question."Unfortunately, in one of [the photos], the flash had washed everything out," Bussert told The
Washington Post in a phone interview Saturday
"And given that the color was the issue, that became problematic."After disclosing this to the state, Bussert and his team discussed whether
they should move forward by presenting all of the photos and explaining the color inconsistencies to the jury - or simply by showing the
jury the evidence in the flesh, as it were.They ultimately made a request to offer "non-testimonial evidence," which was granted by Judge
Elpedio Vitale, who stated it was James's Sixth Amendment right to defend himself.The difficult part then was convincing their client to
expose himself in court, he added."He was, I think, very uncomfortable with the whole idea," Bussert said
"We explained to him why we thought it advanced the defense's case
It was probably the strongest piece of evidence that we could offer
The whole claim was so specific and so unusual - there wasn't a lot of ambiguity about it - we thought, well, if we can refute that, we can
obviously persuade the jury."And so, on Wednesday, after the trial had resumed from a lunch break, Vitale gave a brief warning to the
six-person jury, along with two alternates, that they were about to see "sensitive" evidence, Bussert said.James "stepped up before the jury
box and proceeded to unbutton his pants," Bussert said
"The whole thing took three to five seconds
The court didn't want to make it a huge thing
It's humiliating, ultimately."Somehow, court employees had caught wind of what was going to happen after lunch and packed the courtroom to
watch, according to the New Haven Register, which first reported the story
The jurors reacted in various ways."One of the women looked away
One of the male alternate jurors looked as if he was trying not to have an outburst," co-defense attorney Erica Barber told the newspaper
"I'm sure they were shocked but they did a good job of not showing it."Prosecutor Stacey Miranda argued in court that James might have
changed his pubic hair since 2012 or that the lighting could have caused the accuser to remember her assaulter's penis differently during
the time of the assault."You saw the defendant's penis
What was that!" Miranda told the jury, according to the New York Post
Do we have any idea of what she may have been seeing that night What his manscaping was like at the time What light was shining on
it"Despite the prosecution's protests, the jury ruled James was not guilty on all three counts of first-degree sexual assault.Bussert, who
has practiced law for about 20 years, disputes that he advised his client to expose himself to sensationalize the case or the evidence."I
can fairly say I never envisioned this scenario in my career where something like this would come up," he said
"Here it just seemed like the only real viable option
