Fintech’s next decade will look radically different

INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
Nik Milanovic Contributor Share on Twitter Nik Milanovic is a fintech and financial
inclusion enthusiast, with a decade of work across mobile payments, online lending, credit and microfinance. More posts by this
contributor Fintech next decade will look radically different Libra critics are missing the forest for the trees The birth
and growth of financial technology developed mostly over the last ten years. So as we look ahead, what does the next decade have in store? I
believe we&re starting to see early signs: in the next ten years, fintech will become portable and ubiquitous as it moves to the background
and centralizes into one place where our money is managed for us. When I started working in fintech in 2012, I had trouble tracking
competitive search terms because no one knew what our sector was called
The best-known companies in the space were Paypal and Mint. Google search volume for &fintech,& 2000 & present. Fintech has since become a
household name, a shift that came with with prodigious growth in investment: from $2 billion in 2010 to over $50 billion in venture capital
in 2018 (and on-pace for $30 billion+ this year). Predictions were made along the way with mixed results — banks will go out of business,
banks will catch back up
Big tech will get into consumer finance
Narrow service providers will unbundle all of consumer finance
Banks and big fintechs will gobble up startups and consolidate the sector
Startups will each become their own banks
The fintech ‘bubble& will burst. Who will the winners be in the future of fintech? Here what did happen: fintechs were (and still are)
heavily verticalized, recreating the offline branches of financial services by bringing them online and introducing efficiencies
The next decade will look very different
Early signs are beginning to emerge from overlooked areas which suggest that financial services in the next decade will: Be portable and
interoperable:Like mobile phones, customers will be able to easily transition between ‘carriers&. Become more ubiquitous and
accessible:Basic financial products will become a commodity and bring unbanked participants ‘online&. Move to the background:The users of
financial tools won&t have to develop 1:1 relationships with the providers of those tools. Centralize into a few places and steer on
‘autopilot&. Prediction 1: The open data layer Thesis: Data will be openly portable and will no longer be a competitive moat for
fintechs. Personal data has never had a moment in the spotlight quite like 2019
The Cambridge Analytica scandal and the data breach that compromised 145 million Equifax accounts sparked today public consciousness around
the importance of data security
Last month, the House of Representatives& Fintech Task Force met to evaluate financial data standards and the Senate introduced the Consumer
Online Privacy Rights Act. A tired cliché in tech today is that &data is the new oil.& Other things being equal, one would expect banks to
exploit their data-rich advantage to build the best fintech
But while it necessary, data alone is not a sufficient competitive moat: great tech companies must interpret, understand and build
customer-centric products that leverage their data. Why will this change in the next decade? Because the walls around siloed customer data
in financial services are coming down
This is opening the playing field for upstart fintech innovators to compete with billion-dollar banks, and it happening today. Much of this
is thanks to a relatively obscure piece of legislation in Europe, PSD2
Think of it as GDPR for payment data
The UK became the first to implement PSD2 policy under its Open Banking regime in 2018
The policy requires all large banks to make consumer data available to any fintech which the consumer permissions
So if I keep my savings with Bank A but want to leverage them to underwrite a mortgage with Fintech B, as a consumer I can now leverage my
own data to access more products. Consortia like FDATA are radically changing attitudes towards open banking and gaining global support
In the U.S., five federal financial regulators recently came together with a rare joint statement on the benefits of alternative data, for
the most part only accessible through open banking technology. The data layer, when it becomes open and ubiquitous, will erode the
competitive advantage of data-rich financial institutions
This will democratize the bottom of the fintech stack and open the competition to whoever can build the best products on top of that openly
accessible data… but building the best products is still no trivial feat, which is why Prediction 2 is so important: Prediction 2: The
open protocol layer Thesis: Basic financial services will become simple open-source protocols, lowering the barrier for any company to offer
financial products to its customers. Picture any investment, wealth management, trading, merchant banking, or lending system
Just to get to market, these systems have to rigorously test their core functionality to avoid legal and regulatory risk
Then, they have to eliminate edge cases, build a compliance infrastructure, contract with third-party vendors to provide much of the
underlying functionality (think: Fintech Toolkit) and make these systems all work together. The end result is that every financial services
provider builds similar systems, replicated over and over and siloed by company
Or even worse, they build on legacy core banking providers, with monolith systems in outdated languages (hello, COBOL)
These services don&t interoperate, and each bank and fintech is forced to become its own expert at building financial protocols ancillary to
its core service. But three trends point to how that is changing today: First, the infrastructure and service layer to build is being
disaggregates, thanks to platforms like Stripe, Marqeta, Apex, and Plaid
These ‘finance as a service& providers make it easy to build out basic financial functionality
Infrastructure is currently a hot investment category and will be as long as more companies get into financial services — and as long as
infra market leaders can maintain price control and avoid commoditization. Second, industry groups like FINOS are spearheading the push for
open-source financial solutions
Consider a Github repository for all the basic functionality that underlies fintech tools
Developers could continuously improve the underlying code
Software could become standardized across the industry
Solutions offered by different service providers could become more inter-operable if they shared their underlying infrastructure. And third,
banks and investment managers, realizing the value in their own technology, are today starting to license that technology out
Examples are BlackRock Aladdin risk-management system or Goldman Alloy data modeling program
By giving away or selling these programs to clients, banks open up another revenue stream, make it easy for the financial services industry
to work together (think of it as standardizing the language they all use), and open up a customer base that will provide helpful feedback,
catch bugs, and request new useful product features. As Andreessen Horowitz partner Angela Strange notes, &what that means is, there are
several different infrastructure companies that will partner with banks and package up the licensing process and some regulatory work, and
all the different payment-type networks that you need
So if you want to start a financial company, instead of spending two years and millions of dollars in forming tons of partnerships, you can
get all of that as a service and get going.& Fintech is developing in much the same way computers did: at first software and hardware came
bundled, then hardware became below differentiated operating systems with ecosystem lock-in, then the internet broke open software with
software-as-a-service
In that way, fintech in the next ten years will resemble the internet of the last twenty. Infographic courtesy Placeholder VC Prediction 3:
Embedded fintech Thesis: Fintech will become part of the basic functionality of non-finance products. The concept of embedded fintech is
that financial services, rather than being offered as a standalone product, will become part of the native user interface of other products,
becoming embedded. This prediction has gained supporters over the last few months, and it easy to see why
Bank partnerships and infrastructure software providers have inspired companies whose core competencies are not consumer finance to say &why
not?& and dip their toes in fintech waters. Apple debuted the Apple Card
Amazon offers its Amazon Pay and Amazon Cash products
Facebook unveiled its Libra project and, shortly afterward, launched Facebook Pay
As companies from Shopify to Target look to own their payment and purchase finance stacks, fintech will begin eating the world. If these
signals are indicative, financial services in the next decade will be a feature of the platforms with which consumers already have a direct
relationship, rather than a product for which consumers need to develop a relationship with a new provider to gain access. Matt Harris of
Bain Capital Ventures summarizes in a recent set of essays (one, two) what it means for fintech to become embedded
His argument is that financial services will be the next layer of the ‘stack& to build on top of internet, cloud, and mobile
We now have powerful tools that are constantly connected and immediately available to us through this stack, and embedded services like
payments, transactions, and credit will allow us to unlock more value in them without managing our finances separately. Fintech futurist
Brett King puts it even more succinctly: technology companies and large consumer brands will become gatekeepers for financial products,
which themselves will move to the background of the user experiences
Many of these companies have valuable data from providing sticky, high-affinity consumer products in other domains
That data can give them a proprietary advantage in cost-cutting or underwriting (eg: payment plans for new iPhones)
The combination of first-order services (eg: making iPhones) with second-order embedded finance (eg: microloans) means that they can run
either one as a loss-leader to subsidize the other, such as lowering the price of iPhones while increasing Apple take on transactions in the
app store. This is exciting for the consumers of fintech, who will no longer have to search for new ways to pay, invest, save, and spend
It will be a shift for any direct-to-consumer brands, who will be forced to compete on non-brand dimensions and could lose their customer
relationships to aggregators. Even so, legacy fintechs stand to gain from leveraging the audience of big tech companies to expand their
reach and building off the contextual data of big tech platforms
Think of Uber rides hailed from within Google Maps: Uber made a calculated choice to list its supply on an aggregator in order to reach
more customers right when they&re looking for directions. Prediction 4: Bringing it all together Thesis: Consumers will access financial
services from one central hub. In-line with the migration from front-end consumer brand to back-end financial plumbing, most financial
services will centralize into hubs to be viewed all in one place. For a consumer, the hub could be a smartphone
For a small business, within Quickbooks or Gmail or the cash register. As companies like Facebook, Apple, and Amazon split their operating
systems across platforms (think: Alexa + Amazon Prime + Amazon Credit Card), benefits will accrue to users who are fully committed to one
ecosystem so that they can manage their finances through any platform — but these providers will make their platforms interoperable as
well so that Alexa (e.g.) can still win over Android users. As a fintech nerd, I love playing around with different financial products
But most people are not fintech nerds and prefer to interact with as few services as possible
Having to interface with multiple fintechs separately is ultimately value subtractive, not additive
And good products are designed around customer-centric intuition
In her piece, Google Maps for Money, Strange calls this ‘autonomous finance:& your financial service products should know your own
financial position better than you do so that they can make the best choices with your money and execute them in the background so you don&t
have to. And so now we see the rebundling of services
But are these the natural endpoints for fintech? As consumers become more accustomed to financial services as a natural feature of other
products, they will probably interact more and more with services in the hubs from which they manage their lives
Tech companies have the natural advantage in designing the product UIs we love — do you enjoy spending more time on your bank website or
your Instagram feed? Today, these hubs are smartphones and laptops
In the future, could they be others, like emails, cars, phones or search engines? As the development of fintech mirrors the evolution of
computers and the internet, becoming interoperable and embedded in everyday services, it will radically reshape where we manage our finances
and how little we think about them anymore
One thing is certain: by the time I&m writing this article in 2029, fintech will look very little like it did today. So which financial
technology companies will be the ones to watch over the next decade? Building off these trends, we&ve picked five that will thrive in this
changing environment.