Georgia guv vetoes cyber expense that would criminalize unauthorized access

INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
Enlarge / Georgia Governor Nathan Deal, with wife Sandra Deal, receives the Infinity Gauntlet from Mitch Bell on April 26, 2018 in
Atlanta, Georgia
It is not known if he used the gauntlet to apply the veto stamp to Senate Bill 315, which would have criminalized some security research
while allowing companies to "hack back." (credit: Paras Griffin/Getty Images) A bill passed by Georgia's legislature that would have
criminalized unauthorized access of computer systems and allowed companies to "hack back" in defense against breaches was vetoed on May 8 by
Georgia Governor Nathan Deal
The veto came after many weeks of opposition from information security firms and professionals, as well as major technology
companies—including Google and Microsoft executives, who expressed concern that the bill would actually make it more difficult to secure
computer systems. Given that Georgia is the home of Fort Gordon, an Army base that serves as home to units of the Army's Cyber Command and
to parts of the National Security Agency, and that Georgia has become home to an increasing number of cybersecurity firms as a result both
of the Army/NSA presence and research at Georgia's universities, Deal realized after feedback from the industry that the bill could have
resulted in inadvertent damage. But Deal's reasoning wasn't necessarily what individuals in the information security research community
would have hoped for
And there's still a chance that another bill—one more acceptable to technology giants but still criminalizing some aspects of information
security research—could emerge in the next legislative session and win Deal's approval. Read 7 remaining paragraphs | Comments