20
By Marcus AshworthWith Mario Draghi halfway out of the door, the battle is on for the future direction of European Central Bank monetary policy.
The nature of the contest is arcane, to say the least.
For a while now, the Banque de France governor Francois Villeroy de Galhau has been pushing the idea of ‘tiering’ deposit rates to ease the pain that’s been inflicted on commercial banks by negative interest rates.
At the moment, euro zone lenders are essentially having to pay to park their excess deposits with their central banks, putting a squeeze on profits.
Tiering would exempt some of those excess reserves from the lowest rate, thereby lowering the cost to the banks.
This week, Draghi himself conceded that the ECB needed to reflect on ways to mitigate any adverse affects of negative rates.
Still, the debate is far from over-.Klaas Knot, the Dutch central bank chief, on Thursday poured cold water on tiering.
Peter Praet, ECB’s outgoing chief economist, said there needed to be a solid monetary policy case for making such a change.
How the ECB must regret stopping its bond-buying programmes in December, just as the euro area’s economy stalled.
That an old and complicated idea like tiering is being dusted off again shows the bank is in danger of running out of real policy options.
Rather it is reduced to possibly tinkering around the edges.
The reason the ECB’s benchmark deposit rate is at a negative 40 basis points is to dissuade commercial banks from hoarding surplus cash, and instead encourage them to lend into the wider economy.
Unfortunately, the opposite has happened every time Draghi has cut rates.
More than 1.83 trillion euros ($2.1 trillion) now sits idling with the national central banks.
It’s a monumental waste and shows the ECB’s huge QE and stimulus packages have singularly failed to promote lending.
The transmission mechanism no longer works as the interbank market, and cross-border lending in particular, has dried up.
Messing around at the margins of deposit rates would solve little and would only benefit the stronger banks with the most excess reserves.
It’s not as if this will do much for the commercial banks anyway.
The potential savings may amount to just 7.3 billion euros (or about 6 per cent of euro-area bank profits).
Is this really worth it, when you consider that tiering has been shunned before in case it signals to the wider economy that the ECB is hiking rates
If tiering was worth doing, it should have been done before rates were cut to negative, not as an afterthought now the economy is struggling again.
Indeed, this desperate scraping of the policy barrel is merely making people think that the lower level on negative rates will be here for a long while yet and might even be cut further.
That’s why bond yields continue to fall: The market smells panic.
